More Pages: Todd Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99


Love for the S.o.u.l

Not a comprehensive book for SOC design

A solid reference of value, but not much zing.

Recommended for men, but not for women

Good book for reports

The book is a good read but rather lacking in analysisJanet Todd. Women's Friendship in Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980. 414 pages.
In the introduction to her book, Women's Friendships in Literature, Janet Todd says that the main reason for writing the book is to prove Virginia Woolf wrong. In A Room of One's Own, Woolf claims that she has never encountered a description of real female friendship in the course of her reading. Todd totally disagrees with her. She feels that Eighteenth century literature in particular is "rich in presentations of female friendship" (1) and is going to devote her book to "... the literary phenomenon of female friendship, its form and ideology" (1). However, she warns the reader that, because the main plot in these novels is usually a heterosexual romance, she will also be "touching on the heterosexual and parental relationships" (my italics) (1). At this point, the first problem of the book already becomes clear: Todd fails to give a definition of the term friendship. Whereas Woolf apparently does not see confidantes or mothers and daughters as friends, Todd certainly does. What's more, she seems to call every relationship between women a friendship, although she does distinguish between two types of friendships, which will be discussed later, but only does this at the end of Part I, after about 300 pages. Had the two women's definitions been known from the start, Todd would probably not have to worry about not being "tactful" (6) in "...[entering] a territory which the acute eye of Virginia Woolf failed to scan" (6). The book consists of two parts: In Part I, Todd discusses 10 novels "...because of their primary depictions of women..." (5) and in Part II she discusses some more books, although in less detail, and also "speculat[es] on the authors' experiences of female friendship" (6). Part I is divided into 5 chapters, each dealing with a certain type of friendship by basically relating the plot summary of a relevant book or books as examples of that particular kind of friendship. Samuel Richardson's Clarissa is used as an example of sentimental friendship, erotic friendship is represented by John Cleland's Fanny Hill and Denis Diderot's The Nun, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Julie and the Marquis de Sade's Juliette serve as examples of manipulative friendship, political friendship can be seen in Mary Wollstonecraft's Mary, A Fiction and The Wrongs of Woman and Mme de Staƫl's Delphine, and lastly, Jane Austen's Mansfield Park and Emma are used as examples of social friendship. However, Todd starts off by saying that neither book belongs exclusively to one category and states that these categories "exist only to order, not to cramp" (3). Disappointingly, apart from the very brief definition of the categories and some instances of them in the selected texts given by Todd in the introduction, there is no analysis of the texts at all in Part I, and no further explanation of the categories and why a book has been ordered under a particular category. Even though the categories are only there to order, there must be some logic to this ordering. Moreover, as was said before, the definitions of the two kinds of friendship Todd identifies, are only given in the social friendship section, right at the end of Part I. She divides friendship into vertical friendship, between women who have a different class or status, or women of different ages, and horizontal friendship, between women who are equals. The fact that the reader has to wait so long for these definitions is unfortunate because having it earlier in the book would have clarified a lot, because by far the majority of the friendships that are described in Part I are vertical friendships. The reason for this delay is that the books, and with that also the categories, are ordered more or less chronologically, which places Jane Austen and therefore the social friendship section at the end. Additionally, the plot summaries in Part I vary a lot in style and amount of detail. Whereas Clarissa is described in minute detail in a well structured summary of events which can be followed by those who have not read the novel, the reader seems to be expected to be familiar with Austen's works, which are much less clearly described. Ironically, the larger part of the plot summaries consist of descriptions of the heterosexual and parental relationships that Todd said she would 'touch upon', breaking down the intended shift from conventional focus to the female friendships. This is especially regrettable because a large part of the other relationships does not really help to understand the nature of the female friendship that is supposed to be the focus of the summary. Fortunately, in Part II, the style changes. More emphasis is put on the analysis and comparison of the works that have already been discussed and more novels, like Daniel Defoe's Roxana and Moll Flanders, Choderclos de Laclos' Dangerous Liaisons and Sarah Scott's Millenium Hall, among many others, are brought in to clarify and reaffirm points that were made in Part I. In Chapter seven, The Biographical Context, Todd speculates on the lives of the 'primary authors' from Part I. The conclusion very clearly repeats the similarities and connections between the texts and the motifs like the nosebleeds regularly suffered by the heroines of the novels, symbolizing rape and seduction, which "[keep] the lusty male at bay" (405), the issues of chastity and money and the marks of female debility: illness, madness and death. Over all, Women's Friendship in Literature is a good read, however, it does not live up to its potential. Had there been more analysis and explanation of the different kinds of friendship and the theory behind them, Todd might have been able to convince the reader that there is indeed a multitude of 'real' female friendship to be found in literature, and, although tactfully, triumph over Virginia Woolf.


Frommer Doesn't Deliver For EuropeThe book was intended to be that guide. However, once we opened it up and started looking we were dismayed. Basically, for Germany, they make the crass statement, "Why call this part 'Germany" when Berlin is the only city included? Well, that's the first place you think of Germany? What German city has the most fascinating (and scariest) history? The widest cultural spectrum? The hottest gay nightlife? The most gays and lesbians? Berlin."
So, Germany's guide was limited to Berlin. I, quite personally, don't give a crap that the Frommer writers think this is the only city to focus on/write about. The book promises to deliver this information, as they do in other cities on their USA guide, yet absolutely don't deliver. [Wow], my partner has spent time in Germany in the past and knew generally of (at least) the gay districts in Frankfurt, Hamburg and other cities.
So, if you haven't figured it out yet, find another guide. Unless you only want to travel to the few cities in Europe that Frommer features, don't buy this waste of a good tree and ink.
Poorly organized
Limited to a dozen big cities.

Don't get this, get Womansword insteadJapanese, which purport to teach you Japanese love-slang, for the simple
reason that they are insulting to any reasonable person's intelligence.
Womansword, by Kittredge Cherry, is much better. An exhaustive yet
approachable "pop study" of Japanese vernacular, this thin, smart book
goes beyond basic sexual words, and instead takes on words and idioms
that exist (or once existed) in Japanese, which tell about the
relationship of women in Japanese society. Useful for a serious student
as well as for someone looking for some interesting phrases to spring on
cute Japanese exchange students.
*
Entertainment - high, practicality - low
Not for serious learning of Nihongo

Just doesn't cut it.
A good general reference but does not shine in any one area.The parts that do not conform to that model give some good information on deployment, troublehsooting and administration but is light on the details, especially in the client area. It is an easy read and will give you the basics.
Better to purchase "Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5, Planning, Design and Impementation by Tony Redmond. Study hard, pass the exam, then by Tony's book. Makes you feel like an Exchange Server Champ!
Hard to read